public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug demangler/101779] New: Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW
@ 2021-08-04 19:13 eliz at gnu dot org
2021-08-05 9:00 ` [Bug demangler/101779] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: eliz at gnu dot org @ 2021-08-04 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101779
Bug ID: 101779
Summary: Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: demangler
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: eliz at gnu dot org
Target Milestone: ---
The version of rust-demangle.c included with Binutils 2.37 doesn't
compile with MinGW:
mingw32-gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -gdwarf-4 -g3 -I.
-I../../binutils-2.37/libiberty/../include -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wc++-compat -Wstrict-prototypes -Wshadow=local -pedantic -D_GNU_SOURCE
../../binutils-2.37/libiberty/rust-demangle.c -o rust-demangle.o
../../binutils-2.37/libiberty/rust-demangle.c:84:3: error: unknown type
name 'uint'
84 | uint recursion;
| ^~~~
../../binutils-2.37/libiberty/rust-demangle.c: In function
'demangle_path':
../../binutils-2.37/libiberty/rust-demangle.c:87:37: error: 'uint'
undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'int'?
87 | #define RUST_NO_RECURSION_LIMIT ((uint) -1)
| ^~~~
../../binutils-2.37/libiberty/rust-demangle.c:686:25: note: in expansion
of macro 'RUST_NO_RECURSION_LIMIT'
686 | if (rdm->recursion != RUST_NO_RECURSION_LIMIT)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../../binutils-2.37/libiberty/rust-demangle.c:87:37: note: each undeclared
identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
87 | #define RUST_NO_RECURSION_LIMIT ((uint) -1)
| ^~~~
../../binutils-2.37/libiberty/rust-demangle.c:686:25: note: in expansion
of macro 'RUST_NO_RECURSION_LIMIT'
686 | if (rdm->recursion != RUST_NO_RECURSION_LIMIT)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../../binutils-2.37/libiberty/rust-demangle.c: In function
'rust_demangle_callback':
../../binutils-2.37/libiberty/rust-demangle.c:87:37: error: 'uint'
undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'int'?
87 | #define RUST_NO_RECURSION_LIMIT ((uint) -1)
| ^~~~
../../binutils-2.37/libiberty/rust-demangle.c:1347:55: note: in expansion
of macro 'RUST_NO_RECURSION_LIMIT'
1347 | rdm.recursion = (options & DMGL_NO_RECURSE_LIMIT) ?
RUST_NO_RECURSION_LIMIT : 0;
|
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is because the data type 'uint' is not defined in the MinGW
headers. I used uint32_t instead, and it compiled OK.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug demangler/101779] Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW
2021-08-04 19:13 [Bug demangler/101779] New: Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW eliz at gnu dot org
@ 2021-08-05 9:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-05 10:20 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-05 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101779
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |mingw32
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2021-08-05
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |build
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It looks like rust-demanlge.c is newer in the binutils repository than in the
GCC repository. I cannot find the referenced code in the GCC one. Can you
report the issue to the bugzilla at sourceware.org please?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug demangler/101779] Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW
2021-08-04 19:13 [Bug demangler/101779] New: Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW eliz at gnu dot org
2021-08-05 9:00 ` [Bug demangler/101779] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-05 10:20 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-05 10:43 ` eliz at gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-05 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101779
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Binutils 2.37 has the fix for GCC PR 99935 included, so I suggest adding a
comment to that bug instead.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug demangler/101779] Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW
2021-08-04 19:13 [Bug demangler/101779] New: Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW eliz at gnu dot org
2021-08-05 9:00 ` [Bug demangler/101779] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-05 10:20 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-05 10:43 ` eliz at gnu dot org
2021-08-11 15:07 ` nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-22 17:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: eliz at gnu dot org @ 2021-08-05 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101779
--- Comment #3 from Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> Binutils 2.37 has the fix for GCC PR 99935 included, so I suggest adding a
> comment to that bug instead.
I see that you already reported the issue there (thanks!), so I guess I don't
need to do anything else?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug demangler/101779] Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW
2021-08-04 19:13 [Bug demangler/101779] New: Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW eliz at gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-08-05 10:43 ` eliz at gnu dot org
@ 2021-08-11 15:07 ` nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-22 17:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: nickc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-11 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101779
Nick Clifton <nickc at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton <nickc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note - this bug has been reported and fixed in the binutils copy of the
libiberty sources:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28207
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug demangler/101779] Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW
2021-08-04 19:13 [Bug demangler/101779] New: Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW eliz at gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-08-11 15:07 ` nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-22 17:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-22 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101779
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Dup of bug 99935.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 99935 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-22 17:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-08-04 19:13 [Bug demangler/101779] New: Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW eliz at gnu dot org
2021-08-05 9:00 ` [Bug demangler/101779] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-05 10:20 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-05 10:43 ` eliz at gnu dot org
2021-08-11 15:07 ` nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-22 17:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).