From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 87F47385BF9E; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:53:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 87F47385BF9E From: "xmh970252187 at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/101828] New: The invocation of a virtual function for an object that is not usable in constant expression is accepeted by GCC Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 09:53:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: xmh970252187 at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 09:53:13 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101828 Bug ID: 101828 Summary: The invocation of a virtual function for an object that is not usable in constant expression is accepeted by GCC Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: xmh970252187 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- struct A{ constexpr int virtual fun() const{ return 0; } }; A obj; constexpr A const& rf =3D obj; constexpr int v =3D rf.fun(); According to [expr.const#5.5] > An expression E is a core constant expression unless the evaluation of E,= following the rules of the abstract machine ([intro.execution]), would eva= luate one of the following:=20 >> an invocation of a virtual function for an object unless >>> the object is usable in constant expressions or >>> its lifetime began within the evaluation of E; Since `obj` is not an object that is usable in constant expression as per [expr.const#4] and its lifetime has begun before the declaration of `v`, he= nce its full-expression of the initialization cannot be a constant expression. = It should be ill-formed. https://godbolt.org/z/8hKWs3WEf=