From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 47ADE3844012; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:57:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 47ADE3844012 From: "mailboxnotfound at yahoo dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/101843] Build of binutils-2.37 with gcc-11.2.0 fails due to change to libiberty/hashtab.c Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:57:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mailboxnotfound at yahoo dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:57:01 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101843 --- Comment #6 from john henning --- Let's simplify. Per Richard's comment #1, there won't be a code fix. OK.=20=20 As to a doc fix, Richard wrote:=20 "For release versions your milage may vary and we fail to document working version pairs" YES - it would be nice if working pairs were documented in a list somewhere. BUT - it might also be difficult to keep such a list updated. So let's simplify. How about if=20 https://gcc.gnu.org/install/download.html=20 were to just include the generic advice that if you want to build them together, then you should pick versions that were developed at about the sa= me timeframe. (Yes, this is obvious advice once you understand that they have common subdirectories, such as libiberty/. But it was not obvious to at least one user; and if that advice had been present, the user might have avoided a si= de track.) I've started to bat around possible specific language and perhaps will prop= ose a specific patch along these lines.=