public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/101886] [11/12/13 Regression][concepts TS] ICE with auto as template argument since r11-7011-g6e0a231a4aa2407b
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:39:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-101886-4-6Op1AdS3qk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-101886-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101886

--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka <ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7c8036b26082d8da001e05596777c5f911590e1

commit r13-4799-ga7c8036b26082d8da001e05596777c5f911590e1
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Dec 19 14:59:43 2022 -0500

    c++: ICE with concepts TS multiple auto deduction [PR101886]

    In extract_autos_r, we need to recompute TYPE_CANONICAL for the template
    type parameter after adjusting its index, otherwise we end up with a
    comptypes ICE for the below testcase.  Note that such in-place type
    adjustment isn't generally safe to do since the type could be the
    TYPE_CANONICAL of another (unadjusted) type, but in this case the
    canonical auto (of some level and 0 index) is the first auto (of that
    level) that's created, and so any auto that we do end up adjusting can't
    be the canonical one.

            PR c++/101886

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * pt.cc (extract_autos_r): Recompute TYPE_CANONICAL after
            adjusting the template type parameter's index.  Simplify
            by using TEMPLATE_TYPE_IDX.  Add some sanity checks.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.dg/concepts/auto5.C: New test.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-19 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-12 17:12 [Bug c++/101886] New: [11/12 Regression][concepts] ICE with auto as template parameter reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-12 20:28 ` [Bug c++/101886] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-13  7:49 ` [Bug c++/101886] [11/12 Regression][concepts] ICE with auto as template parameter since r11-7011-g6e0a231a4aa2407b marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-17 13:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-27 17:53 ` [Bug c++/101886] [11/12 Regression][concepts] ICE with auto as template argument " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21  7:50 ` [Bug c++/101886] [11/12 Regression][concepts TS] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-19 20:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-12-19 20:40 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-20 22:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-25 16:34 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-101886-4-6Op1AdS3qk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).