From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 67C35385AC34; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 14:43:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 67C35385AC34 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/101910] [12 Regression] tsvc regressions for -O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize at zen hardware Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 14:43:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 14:43:15 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101910 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, | |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/CPP/latest_runs_report shows regress= ions for s422, in the GCC testsuite copy we do not vectorize this with -O2 since it requires versioning for aliasing. /home/rguenther/src/gcc3/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s422.c:21= :34: missed: versioning for alias required: can't determine dependence between flat_2d_array[_1] and *_7 consider run-time aliasing test between flat_2d_array[_1] and *_7. That's because the code does xx =3D flat_2d_array + 4; for (int nl =3D 0; nl < 8*iterations; nl++) { for (int i =3D 0; i < LEN_1D; i++) { xx[i] =3D flat_2d_array[i + 8] + a[i]; } dummy(a, b, c, d, e, aa, bb, cc, 0.); } but 'dummy' is not known to not clobber 'xx'. While xx is declared __restr= ict that dummy call still gets in the way. So I wonder what variant LNT exactly benchmarks.=