public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "eggert at cs dot ucla.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/101913] New: -Wstrict-overflow -O3 false alarm on tzdb localtime.c Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 20:19:46 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-101913-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101913 Bug ID: 101913 Summary: -Wstrict-overflow -O3 false alarm on tzdb localtime.c Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: eggert at cs dot ucla.edu Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 51304 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51304&action=edit -Wstrict-overflow -O3 false alarms I ran into this problem when compiling tzdb localtime.c with gcc (GCC) 11.2.1 20210728 (Red Hat 11.2.1-1) on x86-64. To reproduce, compile the attached program v.i with: gcc -Wstrict-overflow -O3 -fsanitize=undefined -S v.i The output is: v.i: In function ‘tzloadbody’: v.i:22:1: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur when simplifying con\ ditional to constant [-Wstrict-overflow] 22 | tzloadbody (struct state *sp, int leapcnt0, int timecnt0) | ^~~~~~~~~~ v.i:29:25: warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur when simplifying co\ nditional to constant [-Wstrict-overflow] 29 | sp->types[i] = at <= 0xffffffffu; | ~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1. These diagnostics make no sense, since none of the underlined code involves any operations that can overflow. 2. I looked through the code carefully, and none of the arithmetic operations can possibly overflow. In (result << 8), 'result' is at most 2**32 - 1 and this fits comfortably into 'long'. -1L << 63 is LONG_MIN. "++i" is executed only when i is less than some other int. timecnt++ and leapcnt++ are executed at most INT_MAX times. prevcorr + 1 is evaluated only when prevcorr < corr, and prevcorr - 1 is evaluated only when prevcorr > corr. 3. The diagnostics vanish if you change MYSTERY from 5 to 4 in the first line. This suggests that GCC is somehow getting confused about whether 'long' has 8 bytes (which it does on this platform) or 4 bytes.
next reply other threads:[~2021-08-14 20:19 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-08-14 20:19 eggert at cs dot ucla.edu [this message] 2021-08-14 20:31 ` [Bug middle-end/101913] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-14 22:22 ` eggert at cs dot ucla.edu 2021-08-14 22:30 ` eggert at cs dot ucla.edu 2021-12-23 5:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-31 16:25 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-101913-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).