public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/101995] [9/10/11/12 Regression] regression built-in memset missed-optimization arm -Os
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 02:53:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-101995-4-SiHA3fXJXu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-101995-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101995

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-08-21
             Target|arm                         |arm, aarch64
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
On x86_64 for some reason it works in GCC 9+; tested with " -Os
-mstringop-strategy=libcall" and adding noinline to doStuff just to force to
make sure it does not inline.

Anyways confirmed, worked in GCC 8.2.0 for both aarch64 and arm but does not
work in GCC 9.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-21  2:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-20  9:35 [Bug c/101995] New: " dumoulin.thibaut at gmail dot com
2021-08-20 12:21 ` [Bug middle-end/101995] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-20 21:45 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/101995] [9/10/11/12 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-21  2:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-08-21  3:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-21  3:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-23  9:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-08 14:10 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/101995] [9/10/11/12 Regression] regression built-in memset missed-optimization arm -Os since r9-3594 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-08 20:42 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-08 20:44 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-08 20:50 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-09  8:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-09 21:08 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-20 10:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27  9:46 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/101995] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:40 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/101995] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-101995-4-SiHA3fXJXu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).