From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E348B3858C53; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 10:37:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E348B3858C53 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1661683050; bh=mJd30507CKUJ1CdNvGSq5hKsLNrtDTIvk7yIr0kcSiE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pLe50MeWDmnuaiyixAs8Y8psyC8mP7mitk7YtRYJ57MP1cyMqv5LuRScoXNIhSMEG PmvMYBgfPh0dnFZgaMJK/A+1tsHxmHba22dCyiU6dAnYrbUqIPcKlnbZTlcyiWSW6/ XSPlwwGXUKHW7xWm29iVaqHtYpK4fSnl4QcA5ZHQ= From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/102043] [10/11 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 10:37:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102043 --- Comment #53 from Mikael Morin --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #52) > I posted a mostly-finished patch at [1] to restore array indexing of > descriptor arrays. I forgot to add a link for [1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-July/057980.html=