From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4BB883858409; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 06:26:18 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4BB883858409 From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/102059] Incorrect always_inline diagnostic in LTO mode with #pragma GCC target("cpu=power10") Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 06:26:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, lto, rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 06:26:18 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102059 --- Comment #9 from Kewen Lin --- One more reduced test case: fail cmd: gcc -c -O2 -flto -mcpu=3Dpower8 pass cmd: gcc -c -O2 -flto -mcpu=3Dpower8 -mno-htm -mno-power8-fusion ---------------------- __attribute__((always_inline)) int foo(int *b) { *b +=3D 10; return *b; } #pragma GCC target "cpu=3Dpower10" int bar(int* a){ *a =3D foo(a); return 0; } ---------------------- I confirm the mismatch subset on HTM is expected, ISA 3.1 has removed the transnational memory support. As to OPTION_MASK_P8_FUSION, it's reasonable= to exclude it from ISA3.0 (power9), but I'm not sure if it's not a subset of Power10 new fusion, from the current implementation it isn't. Hi @Mike, could you help to confirm this?=