From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id DCEBA3858019; Wed,  9 Feb 2022 02:33:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DCEBA3858019
From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/102059] Incorrect always_inline diagnostic in LTO mode with
 #pragma GCC target("cpu=power10")
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 02:33:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, lto, rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102059-4-wtn7BaqPMx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 02:33:16 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102059

--- Comment #32 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #31)
> Created attachment 52383 [details]
> Simpler patch to fix the problem with power8-fusion.
>=20
> This patch just ignores the -mpower8-fusion option in the callee if the
> caller does not have it set, and the option wasn't set explicitly.

Thanks for the patch Mike! IMHO, it can also remove the option
-mno-power8-fusion in gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr102059-1_0.c, the case is
designed for the usage reflected by this PR.=