From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 7A7633857C7E; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:22:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7A7633857C7E
From: "matt at godbolt dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/102067] SEGFAULT in varpool_node::get_constructor during
 lto1 when optimising or not using debug symbols
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:22:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, lto
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: matt at godbolt dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102067-4-E5kLCkLjQo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102067-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102067-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:22:28 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102067

--- Comment #21 from Matt Godbolt <matt at godbolt dot org> ---
Thanks, I'd love to upgrade but in this instance I'm stuck on GCC 9.x until=
 the
rest of my company can move to it. Nothing annoys me more than having to say
that, but ... at least we know what it is and that it's fixed in the future=
 :)
This will help me make a case to upgrade!=