public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/102107] protocol register (r12) corrupted before a tail call
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 23:47:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-102107-4-OxXfJsme5M@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-102107-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102107

--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool
<segher@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a989ccd3cbc31cb0e5fecd9423fc1577f3694b0

commit r10-10143-g5a989ccd3cbc31cb0e5fecd9423fc1577f3694b0
Author: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:   Thu Sep 2 16:38:24 2021 +0000

    rs6000: Don't use r12 for CR save on ELFv2 (PR102107)

    CR is saved and/or restored on some paths where GPR12 is already live
    since it has a meaning in the calling convention in the ELFv2 ABI.

    It is not completely clear to me that we can always use r11 here, but
    it does seem save, there is checking code (to detect conflicts here),
    and it is stage 1.  So here goes.

    2021-09-03  Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>

            PR target/102107
            * config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.c (rs6000_emit_prologue): On ELFv2 use
r11
            instead of r12 for CR save, in all cases.

    (cherry picked from commit 2484f7a4b0f52e6ed04754be336f1fa6fde47f6b)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-21 23:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-27 20:54 [Bug target/102107] New: " pc at us dot ibm.com
2021-08-27 21:01 ` [Bug target/102107] " pc at us dot ibm.com
2021-08-27 21:03 ` pc at us dot ibm.com
2021-08-28 21:56 ` pc at us dot ibm.com
2021-08-28 22:33 ` pc at us dot ibm.com
2021-08-30 16:24 ` pc at us dot ibm.com
2021-08-30 19:58 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-30 20:19 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-30 20:42 ` pc at us dot ibm.com
2021-08-30 22:49 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-30 23:42 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-31 13:20 ` pc at us dot ibm.com
2021-08-31 15:22 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-31 17:43 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-01 17:50 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-03 21:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-03 21:08 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-08 13:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-21 23:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-21 23:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-21 23:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-09-21 23:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-21 23:53 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-27 22:26 ` pc at us dot ibm.com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-102107-4-OxXfJsme5M@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).