From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A2BAF385780B; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 07:32:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A2BAF385780B From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/102143] ABI incompatibility with clang when passing 32bit vectors on 32bit i686 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 07:32:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 07:32:44 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102143 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Well, we already have the ABI ISA dependent, typedef int __v8si __attribute__((__vector_size__ (32))); __v8si foo (__v8si x, __v8si y) { return x + y; } has different ABI based on -mavx or -mno-avx, etc. For -mno-avx we emit a warning: /tmp/test.c: In function =E2=80=98foo=E2=80=99: /tmp/test.c:5:1: warning: AVX vector return without AVX enabled changes the= ABI [-Wpsabi] 5 | { | ^ /tmp/test.c:4:1: note: the ABI for passing parameters with 32-byte alignment has changed in GCC 4.6 4 | foo (__v8si x, __v8si y) | ^~~ /tmp/test.c:4:1: warning: AVX vector argument without AVX enabled changes t= he ABI [-Wpsabi] So, depending on what we decide, if the ABI will be ISA dependent, we want a warning like the above one.=