public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/102145] TKR mismatches with -pedantic: -fallow-argument-mismatch does not degrade errors to warnings Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 16:51:13 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-102145-4-0Ncm005NlJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-102145-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102145 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> --- On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 02:14:26PM +0000, ripero84 at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102145 > > --- Comment #2 from ripero84 at gmail dot com --- > 1) The gfortran manual has its own entries for -pedantic and -pedantic-errors: > Seems I owe you an apology. I failed to check the gfortran manual as I assumed these options where inherited from gcc general option pool, and thus, documented in the gcc manual. (option descriptions removed) > 2) This answers part of my issue: the behaviour is indeed > documented, just in a way that has proved confusing to me. Well, there are lots of things that gfortran does that I find confusing, and I've contributed to some of it. ;) > It think that a more accurate description > would start with: > > -pedantic: Issue warnings for some uses of extensions to Fortran, raise > otherwise warnings to errors for others. Not all extensions will raise > warnings or errors. > > which sounds bad. Yes, it sounds bad, but at least reflects reality. -pedantic is not really pedantic. > 3) If this is the intended behaviour I can propose some tweaks > to the documentation, but as I said first I would like to have > a confirmation (ideally by the person who set up the interaction > between -pedantic and -fallow-argument-mismatch) that this is > really intended behaviour, not accidental. You would need to ping Thomas about the intended behavior. > > 4) Apologies for not going into the C discussion, my C is limited, > No apology needed given gfortran's manual documents (badly?) these options. Given the lack of volunteers to maintain gfortran at the moment, the best path forward may be an attempt to clarify the option descriptions. After years of contributing to gfortran, I have come to the conclusion that all extensions should require options to permit them. -std=gnu would activate the options; while, any other -std=... would de-active all of the extensions and issue errors. But, that ship has sailed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-08 16:51 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-08-31 14:59 [Bug fortran/102145] New: " ripero84 at gmail dot com 2021-08-31 17:24 ` [Bug fortran/102145] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-08 14:14 ` ripero84 at gmail dot com 2021-09-08 16:51 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu [this message] 2021-09-12 19:08 ` rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com 2021-09-12 19:09 ` rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com 2021-09-12 19:22 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-12 19:34 ` rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com 2021-09-12 22:56 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2021-09-12 23:40 ` rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com 2021-09-13 2:52 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2021-09-13 5:18 ` rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-102145-4-0Ncm005NlJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).