From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BA4DF3858D37; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 08:50:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BA4DF3858D37 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/102146] [11 regression] several test cases fails after r11-8940 Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 08:50:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 08:50:03 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102146 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Looking at my 6 days old powerpc64le-linux testresults, I see from gcc.target/powerpc/ FAILures FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/compress-float-ppc-pic.c scan-assembler lfs FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/compress-float-ppc.c scan-assembler lfs FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fusion-p10-stst.c scan-assembler-times std 4,8\\\\(3\\\\)\\\\n\\\\tstd 6,16\\\\(3\\\\) 1 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fusion-p10-stst.c scan-assembler-times stfd 1,8\\\\(3\\\\)\\\\n\\\\tstfd 3,16\\\\(3\\\\) 1 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fusion-p10-stst.c scan-assembler-times stw 4,4\\\\(3\\\\)\\\\n\\\\tstw 6,8\\\\(3\\\\) 1 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/lhs-1.c scan-assembler-times nop 3 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/lhs-2.c scan-assembler ori 1,1,0 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c scan-rtl-dump-times combine "\\\\(compar= e:CC \\\\((?:and|zero_extend):(?:DI) \\\\((?:sub)?reg:[SD]I" 1 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-no-update.c scan-assembler-times \\\\mlwz\\= \\M 2 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-no-update.c scan-assembler-times \\\\mplwz\= \\\M 2 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-no-update.c scan-assembler-times \\\\mpstw\= \\\M 2 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-no-update.c scan-assembler-times \\\\mstw\\= \\M 2 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-2.c scan-assembler-times (?n)^\\\\s+[a-z] 2= 0217 FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/rs6000-fpint.c scan-assembler-not stfiwx Comparing with GCC 11.1.0 results, that is +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fusion-p10-stst.c scan-assembler-times std 4,8\\\\(3\\\\)\\\\n\\\\tstd 6,16\\\\(3\\\\) 1 +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fusion-p10-stst.c scan-assembler-times stfd 1,8\\\\(3\\\\)\\\\n\\\\tstfd 3,16\\\\(3\\\\) 1 +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fusion-p10-stst.c scan-assembler-times stw 4,4\\\\(3\\\\)\\\\n\\\\tstw 6,8\\\\(3\\\\) 1 +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr56605.c scan-rtl-dump-times combine "\\\\(compare:CC \\\\((?:and|zero_extend):(?:DI) \\\\((?:sub)?reg:[SD]I" 1 +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-no-update.c scan-assembler-times \\\\mlwz\= \\\M 2 +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-no-update.c scan-assembler-times \\\\mplwz\\\\M 2 +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-no-update.c scan-assembler-times \\\\mpstw\\\\M 2 +FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-no-update.c scan-assembler-times \\\\mstw\= \\\M 2 regression.=