public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102155] New: LIM fill_always_executed_in handles contains_call incorrectly
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 07:09:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-102155-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102155

            Bug ID: 102155
           Summary: LIM fill_always_executed_in handles contains_call
                    incorrectly
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

fill_always_executed_in walks loop bodies in dominator order
(get_loop_body_in_dom_order) but that does not run into BB3 before marking BB4
as always executed:

  do
    {
      BB1:
      if (x)
        BB2:
        if (y)
          BB3:
          bar();
      BB4;
    }
  while (++i < n);


the dominator children of BB1 are BB2 and BB4, BB3 with the call to bar()
is only a dominator child of BB2.

Since LIM gives up on "unanalyzable" refs like calls a testcase that is
miscompiled is a bit difficult to construct - it requires a 'pure' (or const)
call but whether it's valid for those to exit the program could be subject
to discussion.  The following uses a looping const function to show the
effect and the testcase segfaults with -O1+ while it runs into the infinite
loop at -O0.  Note we'd technically need to set looping_const but there's
now way to do this and with just -fno-inline and letting IPA figure out
looping-const dominator children are ordered in a "lucky" way for
fill_sons_in_loop to compute an order that happens to work.

extern void abort (void);
int flag[32];
int __attribute__((noinline,const)) bar (int i) { if (i) return i; while (1); }
int __attribute__((noipa)) foo (int *p, int n)
{
  int i = 0, res = 0;
  do
    {
      if (!flag[i])
        {
          if (i % 3 == 0)
            res += bar (i);
          else
            res++;
        }
      res += *p;
    }
  while (++i < n);
  return res;
}

int main()
{
  if (foo ((int *)0, 5) != 0)
    abort ();
  return 0;
}

             reply	other threads:[~2021-09-01  7:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-01  7:09 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-09-01  7:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102155] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-02  5:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-02  7:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-102155-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).