From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id BC56D385AC3A; Wed,  1 Sep 2021 20:14:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BC56D385AC3A
From: "arnd at linaro dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102162] Byte-wise access optimized away at
 -O1 and above
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 20:14:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: arnd at linaro dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-102162-4-5gbwbFW5iT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102162-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102162-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 20:14:34 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102162

Arnd Bergmann <arnd at linaro dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |arnd at linaro dot org

--- Comment #2 from Arnd Bergmann <arnd at linaro dot org> ---
I tried reproducing the issue with my original kernel code, using this inpu=
t:

typedef unsigned u32;
#define __packed __attribute__((packed))

#define __get_unaligned_t(type, ptr) ({=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=
=20=20=20
\
        const struct { type x; } __packed *__pptr =3D (typeof(__pptr))(ptr)=
;=20=20=20=20=20
\
        __pptr->x;=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=
=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
\
})=20

#define get_unaligned(ptr)      __get_unaligned_t(typeof(*(ptr)), (ptr))

int f_unaligned(u32 *p)
{=20
     return get_unaligned(p);=20
}

int g(u32 *p)=20
{=20
     return *(p);=20
}

and it looks like I get correct output:

hppa64-linux-gcc -S kernel/test_unaligned.c -o - -O2
        .LEVEL 2.0w
        .text
        .align 8
.globl f_unaligned
        .type   f_unaligned, @function
f_unaligned:
        .PROC
        .CALLINFO FRAME=3D0,NO_CALLS
        .ENTRY
        ldb 0(%r26),%r20
        ldb 1(%r26),%r19
        depd,z %r20,39,40,%r20
        depd,z %r19,47,48,%r19
        ldb 2(%r26),%r31
        ldb 3(%r26),%r28
        or %r19,%r20,%r19
        depd,z %r31,55,56,%r31
        or %r31,%r19,%r31
        or %r28,%r31,%r28
        bve (%r2)
        extrd,s %r28,63,32,%r28
        .EXIT
        .PROCEND
        .size   f_unaligned, .-f_unaligned
        .align 8
.globl g
        .type   g, @function
g:
        .PROC
        .CALLINFO FRAME=3D0,NO_CALLS
        .ENTRY
        ldw 0(%r26),%r28
        bve (%r2)
        extrd,s %r28,63,32,%r28
        .EXIT
        .PROCEND
        .size   g, .-g
        .ident  "GCC: (GNU) 11.1.0"

Any idea what the difference is between the working version and your broken
one?=