From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4CFE73857823; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 07:59:58 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4CFE73857823 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/102171] New: vget_low_*/vget_high_* intrinsics should become BIT_FIELD_REF during gimple Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:59:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter blocked target_milestone cf_gcctarget Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:59:58 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102171 Bug ID: 102171 Summary: vget_low_*/vget_high_* intrinsics should become BIT_FIELD_REF during gimple Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Blocks: 95958 Target Milestone: --- Target: aarch64*-linux-gnu #include float16x4_t f0(float16x8_t b) { return vget_low_f16 (b); } float16x4_t f(float16x8_t b) { return vget_high_f16 (b); } float16x4_t f1(float16x8_t b) { return ((float16x4_t*)&b)[0]; } float16x4_t f2(float16x8_t b) { return ((float16x4_t*)&b)[1]; } ---- CUT ---- For little-endian f0 and f1 are the same, and f and f2 are the same. For big-endian f0 and f2 are the same, and f0 and f1 are the same. The reason why we should simplify them at the gimple level is to allow the gimple optimizers do the work for us. Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95958 [Bug 95958] [meta-bug] Inefficient arm_neon.h code for AArch64=