From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 548193858418; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:48:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 548193858418
From: "vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm
 regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:48:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102178-4-Zxz7NoB2Jz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102178-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102178-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:48:23 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102178

--- Comment #26 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> make costs in a way that IRA/LRA prefer re-materialization of constants
> from the constant pool over spilling to GPRs (if that's possible at all -
> Vlad?)

LRA rematerialization can not rematerialize constant value from memory pool=
.=20
It can rematerialize value of expression only consisting of other pseudos
(currently assigned to hard regs) and constants.

I guess rematerialization pass can be extended to work for constants from
constant memory pool.  It is pretty doable project opposite to
rematerialization of any memory which would require a lot analysis including
aliasing and complicated cost calculation benefits.  May be somebody could =
pick
this project up.=