public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22 Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 02:46:37 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-102178-4-kMr4k2Ky8F@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-102178-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 --- Comment #2 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Verified 470.lbm doesn't show regression on Power8 with Ofast. runtime is 141 sec for r12-897, without that patch it is 142 sec.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-07 2:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-09-02 15:38 [Bug tree-optimization/102178] New: " jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-03 7:07 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102178] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-06 6:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-06 6:41 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-07 2:46 ` luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-09-08 14:06 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-16 16:17 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-20 10:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-26 15:57 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-27 7:42 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/102178] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-27 7:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-27 8:13 ` crazylht at gmail dot com 2022-01-27 8:18 ` crazylht at gmail dot com 2022-01-27 8:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-27 9:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-27 9:55 ` Jan Hubicka 2022-01-27 9:55 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz 2022-01-27 10:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-27 10:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-27 10:23 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz 2022-01-27 10:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-27 11:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-27 11:30 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2022-01-27 11:33 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2022-01-27 12:04 ` Jan Hubicka 2022-01-27 12:04 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz 2022-01-27 13:42 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2022-01-27 14:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-27 16:28 ` crazylht at gmail dot com 2022-01-27 16:36 ` crazylht at gmail dot com 2022-01-28 15:48 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-28 16:02 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-09 15:51 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-10 7:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-10 15:17 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-11 13:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-25 9:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-25 12:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-25 13:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-25 13:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-26 6:55 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-27 9:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-21 9:10 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12/13/14/15 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-102178-4-kMr4k2Ky8F@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).