public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "crazylht at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 16:36:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-102178-4-ua6j7IozaD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-102178-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178

--- Comment #25 from Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> ---
> Guess we need to let RA know mem cost is cheaper than GPR for r249.

Reduce sse_store cost?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-27 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-02 15:38 [Bug tree-optimization/102178] New: " jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-03  7:07 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102178] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-06  6:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-06  6:41 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-07  2:46 ` luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-08 14:06 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-16 16:17 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-20 10:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-26 15:57 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-27  7:42 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/102178] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-27  7:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-27  8:13 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-27  8:18 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-27  8:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-27  9:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-27  9:55   ` Jan Hubicka
2022-01-27  9:55 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz
2022-01-27 10:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-27 10:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-27 10:23 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz
2022-01-27 10:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-27 11:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-27 11:30 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-01-27 11:33 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-01-27 12:04   ` Jan Hubicka
2022-01-27 12:04 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz
2022-01-27 13:42 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2022-01-27 14:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-27 16:28 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-27 16:36 ` crazylht at gmail dot com [this message]
2022-01-28 15:48 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-28 16:02 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-09 15:51 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-10  7:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-10 15:17 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-11 13:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-25  9:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-25 12:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-25 13:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-25 13:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-26  6:55 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-27  9:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-21  9:10 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12/13/14/15 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-102178-4-ua6j7IozaD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).