From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id AA7783858430; Sat,  4 Sep 2021 09:30:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AA7783858430
From: "eyalroz1 at gmx dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/102199] New: is_default_constructible incorrect for
 an inner type with NSDMI
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2021 09:30:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: eyalroz1 at gmx dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-102199-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2021 09:30:22 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102199

            Bug ID: 102199
           Summary: is_default_constructible incorrect for an inner type
                    with NSDMI
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: eyalroz1 at gmx dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Stackoverflow discussion: https://stackoverflow.com/q/69050558/1593077
Related LLVM bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D38374
GodBolt: https://godbolt.org/z/snPf7Ks4W

Consider the following program:

#include <type_traits>

struct outer {
    struct inner {
        // inner() { }
        unsigned int x =3D 0;
    };
//    static_assert(std::is_default_constructible<inner>::value,
//          "not default ctorable - inside");
};

static_assert(std::is_default_constructible<outer::inner>::value,
    "not default ctorable - outside");

It compiles. But if we uncomment the first static_assert - it evaluates to
false. Mind you: Not because struct inner is incomplete; it is simply deeme=
d to
not be default-constructible. But - it _is_ default constructible. And if we
add a method to struct outer which default-constructs an inner, it will wor=
k.

Also note that if we uncomment the explicit default ctor the definition of
struct inner, both asserts pass.


clang++ seems to exhibit this too (also with -stdlib=3Dlibc++). I'm not sure
whether this is an actual bug in the library, or whether the standard manda=
tes
this in some freakish way, but - it's just wrong.=