From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 4CA60385DC31; Tue,  7 Sep 2021 03:18:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4CA60385DC31
From: "gabravier at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/102224] [9/10/11/12 regession] wrong code for `x *
 copysign(1.0, x)`
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 03:18:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gabravier at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-102224-4-xPKVE5NvWu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102224-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102224-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 03:18:21 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102224

Gabriel Ravier <gabravier at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[12 regession] wrong code   |[9/10/11/12 regession]
                   |for `x * copysign(1.0, x)`  |wrong code for `x *
                   |                            |copysign(1.0, x)`

--- Comment #6 from Gabriel Ravier <gabravier at gmail dot com> ---
Actually, I've only gotten a snapshot from the 5th, which does not appear to
include HJ's patch from the 4th (which seems rather odd). Does it happen to=
 fix
this ? I'd assume it does not, since that patch just seems to care about not
destructing the source and not about the emission of the xor that breaks th=
is,
but I can't know for sure rn.=