From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 73C883858407; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:39:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 73C883858407
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1711546751;
	bh=ZpLra/EGBZtGps5AmCSxrLKJxxMPpGjYZ0AkzjH+vpQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=QVIoU8++2grpEeCVAAAqBa5zYok8RaUqSFFYZFzcQBSF1pKydV3HdZkX/vh7NZRR1
	 baP4eiaNsATaY74wF9YyWybA4KhyaPkk6jducHk4hZqwpbkxPZNzdkZU4nlga5oVN9
	 d018IZt3WHU/MsmGeuHy9XeRfrwOP0Igwr9m0djw=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/102257] call of overloaded 'tuple' is ambiguous
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:39:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102257-4-VxiWRW8qU6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102257-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102257-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102257

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> See https://wg21.link/cwg1228 this might be invalid code and GCC is corre=
ct
> in rejecting it.

So dup of PR 84849 ?=