From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 200223858C3A; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 07:46:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 200223858C3A From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/102261] [12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in build_this_conversion) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 07:46:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed target_milestone cf_known_to_work bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 07:46:55 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102261 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2021-09-10 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Known to work| |11.2.1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed. 2289 conversion *t =3D implicit_conversion (parmtype, argtype, arg, 2290 /*c_cast_p=3D*/false, flags, complain); 2291 t->this_p =3D this_p; 2292 return t; 2293 } 2294 2295 /* Create an overload candidate for the function or method FN called (gdb) p t $1 =3D (conversion *) 0x0 note I'm not sure the particular error is very helpful. Why do we even support asm("...") on aggregate types?=