From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 32C1F3858D29; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 19:06:14 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 32C1F3858D29 From: "dangelog at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/102283] New: Inconsistent/wrong overload resolution when using an initializer list and a defaulted template parameter Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 19:06:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dangelog at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 19:06:14 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102283 Bug ID: 102283 Summary: Inconsistent/wrong overload resolution when using an initializer list and a defaulted template parameter Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dangelog at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Hello, The following testcase has an "inconsistent" overload resolution: template struct helper {}; struct data {}; template struct S=20 { template void f(T2 &&); // #1 template void f(const helper &); // #2 }; int main() { S s1; S s2; s1.f({}); s2.f({}); } https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/nsj48M7af On GCC 11, the the first call to f() resolves to #1, but the second call resolves to #2. I cannot find any reason for this inconsistency in the rank= ing of the overloads; no warnings are emitted under -Wall -Wextra.=20 Clang and MSVC both always call #1.=