From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 367C63858408; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 07:35:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 367C63858408 From: "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/102310] [11/12 Regression] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis with OpenACC Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 07:35:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openacc X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords cc cf_gcctarget Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 07:35:47 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102310 Thomas Schwinge changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |openacc CC| |jules at gcc dot gnu.org Target|gcn | --- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge --- Both ICEs confirmed. Does need '-fopenacc' to reproduce, but doesn't need = an actual GCC offloading configuration; ICEs in host compilation. Julian, please have a look at the test case: should GCC be able to handle t= hat one fine, or is "something" missing in GCC/OpenACC; ICE of course is not the correct answer in any case. ;-) Also, note that the "w/o any optimization level" ICE looks like what I rece= ntly also ran into (still un-fixed), when working on reference data type things = -- which I suppose is relevant here, as these are Fortran dummy arguments to a 'SUBROUTINE'.=