From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DA0983858D37; Mon, 26 Dec 2022 19:55:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DA0983858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1672084557;
	bh=pBsV3sRGFdAgoCuGYcMQ8Oc/B4bQPSakX+nH5ZZmMI0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ovDVFWGJmKbQAhmtLc8XR1T9DjwiaZIO36r8eoOu1YLFOYhgNNfAaHsIb51PXeweu
	 KekBgYJ03Rb4YYWuldYH0q6/CQ3BdeNOVggcevsDswFvlwghoNgOiszmeD+rpGzjvO
	 7YWk8sAMiuT4EWIoKEBfnkwdj//Tg2d7OlIbbYRA=
From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/102331] ICE in attr_decl1, at fortran/decl.c:8691
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 19:55:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-102331-4-xlsyDtzyFf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102331-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102331-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102331

Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg

--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
After exploring a while and looking for other places I have concluded that =
for
invalid code Steve's patch is adequate.

I will regression test it next.=