From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 042053858D3C; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:13:16 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 042053858D3C
From: "pdimov at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/102350] __builtin_source_location not available in earlier
 language modes
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:13:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pdimov at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102350-4-2GRhDiOBW9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102350-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102350-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:13:16 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102350

--- Comment #7 from Peter Dimov <pdimov at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> Sure. It's just a question of whether we're trying to provide a general
> purpose extension available for users, or an internal helper for the
> std::lib. IIRC we explicitly decided we only cared about supporting the
> latter.

Yes, of course. It's just that __builtin_source_location is so painfully cl=
ose
to exactly what I want - it gives a single pointer representing the locatio=
n -
that it would be a pity not being able to use it without -std=3Dc++20.=