From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 849643858D34; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 11:06:19 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 849643858D34 From: "dangelog at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/102397] New: Documentation of attribute syntax does not discuss C++11 / C23 attribute syntax Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 11:06:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dangelog at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 11:06:19 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102397 Bug ID: 102397 Summary: Documentation of attribute syntax does not discuss C++11 / C23 attribute syntax Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dangelog at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Hi, The available documentation for attributes syntax=20 https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Attribute-Syntax.html#Attribute-Syntax does not mention at all the possibility that in C++11 (and, I imagine, in C= 23) one can specify any GCC-specific attribute using a [[gnu::attribute]] attri= bute specifier, and not only the GCC-specific __attribute__((attribute)) syntax. I think it would be worth mentioning in there that this is actually OK and fully supported.=