From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2DA743858D34; Sat, 18 Sep 2021 11:24:48 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2DA743858D34 From: "dangelog at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/102399] New: Cannot mix GCC and C++11 / C23 attribute syntax Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 11:24:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dangelog at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 11:24:48 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102399 Bug ID: 102399 Summary: Cannot mix GCC and C++11 / C23 attribute syntax Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dangelog at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Hello, If one tries to mix GCC's attribute syntax (__attribute__) and with C++11 /= C23 ([[attribute]]), GCC rejects the code (no matter what the order of the attributes is): #define EXPORT __attribute__((visibility("default"))) struct [[nodiscard]] EXPORT Foo { Foo(); }; https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/W868xjeMq While a workaround exists (by sticking to the same "kind" of attribute synt= ax), it's not always possible or easy to achieve in big codebases, where for compatibility/legacy reasons the attributes are expanded via macros and can expand to a random combination of GCC or C++ attributes. For comparison, Clang and MSVC allow mixed syntaxes.=