public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/102419] [11/12 Regression][concepts] [regression] return-type-requirement of "Y<typename T::type>" does not check that T::type actually exists Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:49:58 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-102419-4-42IilYbXAu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-102419-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102419 Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The behavior of this testcase was changed with r11-7454 (the testcase concepts-return-req2.C added there is essentially identical to this one). Before this commit, we'd substitute template arguments into the return-type-requirement before checking satisfaction, and now we substitute template arguments as part of satisfaction (into the normal form of the constraint, which is just 'true (with an empty parameter mapping)'), which explains the behavior change. AFAICT, the standard is inconsistent about whether a separate substitution should be performed here. On the one hand, [expr.prim.req.compound] says - Substitution of template arguments (if any) into the return-type-requirement is performed. which suggests a separate substitution should be performed. On the other hand, the example in that same section says a compound-requirement is equivalent to a simple-requirement & nested-requirement: Given concepts C and D, requires { { E1 } -> C; { E2 } -> D<A1, ⋯, An>; }; is equivalent to requires { E1; requires C<decltype((E1))>; E2; requires D<decltype((E2)), A1, ⋯, An>; }; and we certainly shouldn't be doing a separate substitution when checking a nested-requirement. IIUC, GCC's behavior is consistent with the example. Generally GCC tries to avoid doing a separate substitution into a constraint whenever we can get away with it and instead perform the substitution as part of satisfaction. This e.g. also occurs for the type-constraint of a placeholder type: template<class, class> concept Y = true; template<class T> void f() { Y<typename T::type> auto y = 0; } template void f<int>(); // GCC accepts, Clang/MSVC reject
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-21 14:49 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-09-20 21:32 [Bug c++/102419] New: [concepts] " arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com 2021-09-21 6:46 ` [Bug c++/102419] [11/12 Regression][concepts] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-21 14:49 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-09-21 14:56 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-21 15:18 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-21 20:00 ` arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com 2021-09-23 14:58 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-17 13:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-27 19:21 ` [Bug c++/102419] [11/12 Regression][concepts] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-27 19:22 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-21 7:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-03-30 17:08 ` [Bug c++/102419] [11/12/13 " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-29 10:05 ` [Bug c++/102419] [11/12/13/14 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-28 20:44 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-102419-4-42IilYbXAu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).