From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 747BF3858415; Tue,  5 Oct 2021 23:41:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 747BF3858415
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/102485] -Wa,-many no longer has any effect
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 23:41:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102485-4-AUn7VSNXn9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102485-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 23:41:28 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102485

--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #4)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Paul Clarke from comment #2)
> > > "-many" is supposed to make those black boxes just work.  This worked=
 before
> > > recent changes to binutils/GCC.  Is there any valid use of "-Wa,-many=
" now?
> >=20
> > It will still work if you are "compiling" a .s or .S, no?
>=20
> Correct, since GCC doesn't actually compile anything, the asm is just pas=
sed
> directly to the assembler as is (modulo preprocessing, but that won't emi=
t a
> .machine directive).

Yes.  I just didn't verify it actually still works after the changes :-)=