From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 98E023858036; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 22:11:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 98E023858036 From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/102485] -Wa,-many no longer has any effect Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 22:11:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 22:11:03 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102485 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Paul Clarke from comment #2) > GCC putting the base ".machine" directive at the beginning of the file ma= kes > any command-line use of "-many" (-Wa,-many) be ignored. Is that OK?=20 If people do not use -Wa,-many unnecessarily, it probably would be good if the assembler somehow retained that option. But I get the impression that that option is used a lot for no good reason at all, and that causes weird problems. > "-many" is supposed to make those black boxes just work. This worked bef= ore > recent changes to binutils/GCC. Is there any valid use of "-Wa,-many" no= w? It will still work if you are "compiling" a .s or .S, no?=