public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102505] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_sra_access_forest with 16 byte aligned field and virtual inheritance since r10-6321-g636e80eea24b780f
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:27:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-102505-4-VzbaWWUIcK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-102505-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102505
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor <jamborm@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f217e87972a2a207e793101fc05cfc9dd095c678
commit r12-4662-gf217e87972a2a207e793101fc05cfc9dd095c678
Author: Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
Date: Mon Oct 25 15:22:06 2021 +0200
sra: Fix the fix for PR 102505 (PR 102886)
I was not careful with the fix for PR 102505 and did not craft the
check to satisfy the verifier carefully, which lead to PR 102886.
(The verifier has the test structured differently and somewhat
redundantly, so I could not just copy it).
This patch fixes it. I hope it is quite obvious correction of an
oversight and so will commit it if survives bootstrap and testing on
x86_64-linux and ppc64le-linux.
Testcase for this bug is gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-18.c (but only on
platforms with constant pools). I will backport the two fixes
to the release branches squashed.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2021-10-22 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
PR tree-optimization/102886
* tree-sra.c (totally_scalarize_subtree): Fix the out of
access-condition.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-25 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-27 19:49 [Bug c/102505] New: [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_sra_access_forest, at tree-sra.c:2368 gscfq@t-online.de
2021-09-27 19:49 ` [Bug c/102505] " gscfq@t-online.de
2021-09-27 22:01 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102505] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-28 8:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102505] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_sra_access_forest with 16 byte aligned field and virtual inheritance rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-30 9:52 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102505] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_sra_access_forest with 16 byte aligned field and virtual inheritance since r10-6321-g636e80eea24b780f marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-07 15:48 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-21 10:58 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-21 12:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-25 13:27 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-10-27 17:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-02 10:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-02 12:29 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-102505-4-VzbaWWUIcK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).