From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4E71C3858013; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:13:23 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4E71C3858013 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/102543] New: -march=cascadelake performs odd alignment peeling Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:13:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:13:23 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102543 Bug ID: 102543 Summary: -march=3Dcascadelake performs odd alignment peeling Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- For gcc.dg/torture/pr65270-1.c we choose to misalign an aligned store + load combo for runtime aligning a single load because we have (skylake_cost): {6, 6, 6, 10, 20}, /* cost of loading SSE register in 32bit, 64bit, 128bit, 256bit = and 512bit */ {8, 8, 8, 12, 24}, /* cost of storing SSE register in 32bit, 64bit, 128bit, 256bit = and 512bit */ {6, 6, 6, 10, 20}, /* cost of unaligned loads. */ {8, 8, 8, 8, 16}, /* cost of unaligned stores. */ which means that an unaligned store is cheaper than an aligned store for %ymm and even more so for %zmm!??=