From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 15875385840E; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:23:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 15875385840E
From: "qing.zhao at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102586] [12 Regression] ICE in
 clear_padding_type, at gimple-fold.c:4798 since r12-3433-ga25e0b5e6ac8a77a
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:23:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: qing.zhao at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102586-4-8kvQl9kDE5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102586-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102586-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:23:08 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102586

--- Comment #23 from Qing Zhao <qing.zhao at oracle dot com> ---
> On Feb 11, 2022, at 9:29 AM, jason at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.g=
nu.org> wrote:
>=20
> I wonder why -fauto-var-init uses builtin_clear_padding instead of just
> zero-initializing the whole object before normal initialization, as with
> value-initialization?  With a new object we don't need to get clever.

In the initial several versions of the implementation, I didn=E2=80=99t use
builtin_clear_padding, other that
that, I just zero-initialized the whole object before normal initialization.
However, multiple people
suggested to use builtin_clear_padding instead. Then in the later
implementations, I used
builtin_clear_padding for the padding initialization.=