From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 8E2003858C2D; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:08:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8E2003858C2D
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102586] [12 Regression] ICE in
 clear_padding_type, at gimple-fold.c:4798 since r12-3433-ga25e0b5e6ac8a77a
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:08:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102586-4-Mw5Fckaor1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102586-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102586-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:08:41 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102586

--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Which binfo has non-0 offset though?
When processing that C5 type with sz of 9, the FIELD_DECLs have C2 type and
 debug_tree (field)
 <field_decl 0x7fffea3bdda8 D.2410
    type <record_type 0x7fffea3a8348 C2 addressable needs-constructing
cxx-odr-p type_5 BLK
        size <integer_cst 0x7fffea23ef48 constant 64>
        unit-size <integer_cst 0x7fffea23ef60 constant 8>
...
    private ignored decl_6 BLK pr102586.C:5:8 size <integer_cst 0x7fffea23e=
f48
64> unit-size <integer_cst 0x7fffea23ef60 8>
...
and
p debug_tree (field->typed.type->type_non_common.maxval)
 <tree_binfo 0x7fffea3bc000
    type <record_type 0x7fffea3a8348 C2 addressable needs-constructing
cxx-odr-p type_5 BLK
...
    tree_2 bases:2 offset <integer_cst 0x7fffea23ef78 0>>
then there is a FIELD_DECL with C1 type which is ignored because it is an e=
mpty
type and then
p debug_tree (field)
 <field_decl 0x7fffea3c4130 D.2415
    type <record_type 0x7fffea3bf348 C4 addressable needs-constructing
cxx-odr-p type_5 BLK
        size <integer_cst 0x7fffea23ef90 constant 128>
        unit-size <integer_cst 0x7fffea23efa8 constant 16>
...
    size <integer_cst 0x7fffea3b5ca8 type <integer_type 0x7fffea25f0a8
bitsizetype> constant 72>
    unit-size <integer_cst 0x7fffea3b5c78 type <integer_type 0x7fffea25f000
sizetype> constant 9>
...
p debug_tree (field->typed.type->type_non_common.maxval)
 <tree_binfo 0x7fffea3bc070
    type <record_type 0x7fffea3bf348 C4 addressable needs-constructing
cxx-odr-p type_5 BLK
...
    tree_2 bases:2 offset <integer_cst 0x7fffea23ef78 0>>
so TYPE_BINFO (TREE_TYPE (field)) is non-NULL and
BINFO_OFFSET (TYPE_BINFO (TREE_TYPE (field))) is integer_zerop in both case=
s.=