public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/102599] New: Wrong simplification of inquiry parameters for complex arrays
@ 2021-10-04 20:06 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-04 21:33 ` [Bug fortran/102599] " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-04 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102599
Bug ID: 102599
Summary: Wrong simplification of inquiry parameters for complex
arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Consider:
program p
implicit none
complex, parameter :: x(2) = 1
real, parameter :: r(*) = x%re
real, parameter :: i(*) = x%im
print *, r, all(r == 1) ! wrong
print *, i, all(i == 0) ! wrong
print *, x%re, all(x%re == 1) ! OK
print *, x%im, all(x%im == 0) ! OK
end
This prints:
1.00000000 0.00000000 T
1.00000000 0.00000000 F
1.00000000 1.00000000 T
0.00000000 0.00000000 T
The first two lines should be identical to the last two.
The dump-tree has:
static real(kind=4) r[2] = {__complex__ (1.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (1.0e+0,
0.0)};
static real(kind=4) i[2] = {__complex__ (1.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__ (1.0e+0,
0.0)};
static complex(kind=4) x[2] = {__complex__ (1.0e+0, 0.0), __complex__
(1.0e+0, 0.0)};
which is nonsense for r, i.
Furthermore, all(x%re == 1) and all(x%im == 0) are not simplified, but that's
another story...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/102599] Wrong simplification of inquiry parameters for complex arrays
2021-10-04 20:06 [Bug fortran/102599] New: Wrong simplification of inquiry parameters for complex arrays anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-10-04 21:33 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-04 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102599
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Replacing
real, parameter :: r(*) = x%re
real, parameter :: i(*) = x%im
by
real, parameter :: r(*) = real (x)
real, parameter :: i(*) = imag (x)
fixes things.
Similarly, the scalar variant
real, parameter :: y = real (x(1))
real, parameter :: z = imag (x(1))
print *, y, z
works fine, but
real, parameter :: y = x(1)%re
real, parameter :: z = x(1)%im
print *, y, z
ICEs in trans-array::gfc_get_descriptor_field, since we miss the
simplification.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-04 21:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-04 20:06 [Bug fortran/102599] New: Wrong simplification of inquiry parameters for complex arrays anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-04 21:33 ` [Bug fortran/102599] " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).