From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2C96D385840F; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 05:24:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2C96D385840F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714109094;
	bh=FmjfEU4QTeTSQXP6fsOEd1+DdHHk5CienoiT8ObggY0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=nVXPHKOzWnkcyuuW7t+/gbHoHE3EjaD/0RXzgKzZeFZqnwbYVLZgwEk1M+/SXEzNG
	 WqevFA7kNksvIjp83aopA5FD52SAV+DQIi71izfO1Sfa8lQ5INNRNMKFlI4aaN6x/V
	 VAsP+BIiM8njXXzLbVzWtCmjKp+/4J7twDlC2BXE=
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/102620] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span, at
 fortran/trans-array.c:865 since r12-1233-gd514626ee2566c68
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 05:24:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102620-4-6hrwNZk233@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102620-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102620-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102620

--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #10)
> (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #9)
> > (In reply to anlauf from comment #8)
> > > I get the same behavior at r13-8559 as 14-mainline.  There seems to be
> > > another commit that fixed it independently.
> > >=20
> > > Removing 13-branch from the regression list.
> >=20
> > Mark as fixed or backport fixes?
>=20
> Either I did something wrong, or the bug reappeared on 13-branch...
>=20
> Anyway, I tried backporting Andre's patch to 13- and 12-branch.
> Works fine and regtests fine.
>=20
> How to proceed?
>=20
> I can push those changes, so that we are finally done with this PR.

Hi Harald,

It would be splendid if you would backport the patch. In the last week or s=
o, I
have built up quite a list of backports to do, which I will attend to over =
the
weekend.

We are down from 105 regressions on 26th March to 94 now, of which 13 are n=
ow
fixed on mainline. Since there are still some P1 regressions, I have been
prowling around looking for more low hanging edibles while there is still t=
ime.

Regards

Paul=