From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 948DB3858416; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 18:32:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 948DB3858416
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714069946;
	bh=RJXDGcJ/5oyJrOCOvH8STmZ9TqT3QvLMweWHCI+oFlY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=uVkKvhEiu98ovXHm/uHxXd191pNXjyBvEVDB/Mw8YN3TxNe3TuszQZeEhUwtIM/UB
	 sp8Re5W+5shZwOZcwhZ5walQqqsXOX03xzANhwj3ekkKgw2PtRkNS61GfbxiwRBnGj
	 ZwkQvcWnXAbyE6aJSwbsia49axk2tgH/X7qURa2Q=
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/102620] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span, at
 fortran/trans-array.c:865 since r12-1233-gd514626ee2566c68
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 18:32:25 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102620-4-U2bA9Phprr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102620-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102620-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102620

--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #9)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #8)
> > I get the same behavior at r13-8559 as 14-mainline.  There seems to be
> > another commit that fixed it independently.
> >=20
> > Removing 13-branch from the regression list.
>=20
> Mark as fixed or backport fixes?

Either I did something wrong, or the bug reappeared on 13-branch...

Anyway, I tried backporting Andre's patch to 13- and 12-branch.
Works fine and regtests fine.

How to proceed?

I can push those changes, so that we are finally done with this PR.=