From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id ADA093858427; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:32:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ADA093858427 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/102627] [11/12 Regression] wrong code with "-O1" Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 10:32:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on target_milestone component priority bug_status cc short_desc everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 10:32:35 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102627 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2021-10-06 Target Milestone|--- |11.3 Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, | |vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|wrong code with "-O1" |[11/12 Regression] wrong | |code with "-O1" Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Started with r11-8008-g4bbd51afaa4a3c116fb538d912b35e126be80b41 (at least on the #c1 testcase at -O1, I don't see any aliasing issue nor any other UB in= the source there so e.g. -fno-strict-aliasing or -fwrapv isn't needed) so possi= bly a RA issue.=