public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/102627] [11 Regression] wrong code with "-O1" Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 16:11:51 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-102627-4-P7uXGvxPEd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-102627-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102627 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99d21577f8a00196f3133fe1066de6e3e7d180c1 commit r11-9154-g99d21577f8a00196f3133fe1066de6e3e7d180c1 Author: Vladimir N. Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com> Date: Fri Oct 8 10:16:09 2021 -0400 [PR102627] Use at least natural mode during splitting hard reg live range In the PR test case SImode was used to split live range of cx on x86-64 because it was the biggest mode for this hard reg in the function. But all 64-bits of cx contain structure members. We need always to use at least natural mode of hard reg in splitting to fix this problem. gcc/ChangeLog: PR rtl-optimization/102627 * lra-constraints.c (split_reg): Use at least natural mode of hard reg. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR rtl-optimization/102627 * gcc.target/i386/pr102627.c: New test.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-14 16:11 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-10-06 8:37 [Bug tree-optimization/102627] New: " suochenyao at 163 dot com 2021-10-06 10:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102627] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-06 10:32 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/102627] [11/12 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-06 10:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-07 19:54 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-08 16:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-11 8:32 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/102627] [11 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-14 16:11 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-10-14 16:15 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-22 20:11 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-102627-4-P7uXGvxPEd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).