From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 6D3E73858D35; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 17:39:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6D3E73858D35
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/102685] [12 Regression] ICE in
 output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 17:39:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status priority cf_reconfirmed_on
 everconfirmed cc
Message-ID: <bug-102685-4-Tbx5CWnBeb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102685-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102685-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 17:39:21 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102685

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
           Priority|P3                          |P4
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-10-11
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
                 CC|                            |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
That's arguably a regression.

gcc-11 accepted the invalid testcase in comment#0 but generated wrong code.

The real reason is that the constructor is not dealth with properly,
and there are several related PRs I am too lazy to look up now.

The accepts-invalid for comment#1 is old and not a regression for that reas=
on.
gcc-7 had that already, and maybe much longer.=