From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 6AEC13858409; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:43:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6AEC13858409
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/102704] NRVO for throw expression
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:43:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-102704-4-pB4hy0PnDe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102704-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102704-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:43:56 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102704

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-10-13

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
[class.copy.elision] p1:
This elision of copy/move operations, called copy elision, is permitted in =
the
following circumstances (which may be combined to eliminate multiple copies=
):
-- in a return statement [...]
-- in a throw-expression (7.6.18), when the operand is the name of a
non-volatile object with automatic storage duration (other than a function =
or
catch-clause parameter) that belongs to a scope that does not contain the
innermost enclosing compound-statement associated with a try-block (if ther=
e is
one), the copy/move operation can be omitted by constructing the object
directly into the exception object
-- in a coroutine [...]
-- when the exception-declaration of an exception handler [...]


The slightly confusing "does not contain the innermost enclosing
compound-statement" means you can't elide if the throw is in a try-block and
the variable was defined outside it.

So this cannot be elided:

void f()
{
  mytype x;
  try {
    throw x;
  } catch (int) {
  }
}

But this can be:

void g()
{
  try {
    mytype x;
    throw x;
  } catch (int) {
  }
}

And the example in comment 0 can be.=