From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 94B703857C72; Fri,  5 Nov 2021 07:08:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 94B703857C72
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102714] [10 Regression] A volatile-related
 problem cased by ipa inline pass
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 07:08:46 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102714-4-8Gbr9EONKe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102714-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102714-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 07:08:46 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102714

--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021, duan.db at linux dot alibaba.com wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102714
>=20
> --- Comment #10 from Bo Duan <duan.db at linux dot alibaba.com> ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Bo Duan from comment #6)
> > > Hello, should we backport this patch to gcc-10?
> >=20
> > It's scheduled for a backport to GCC 11, I'm not aware that GCC 10 is
> > affected?
>=20
> Hi, I am going to backport this patch to GCC 10, is it ok for you=EF=BC=9F

I will handle this when I do my next round of backports to GCC 10.=