From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3E699385802A; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:01:38 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3E699385802A From: "nickhuang99 at hotmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/102728] New: requires statement fails to recognize lambda in unevaluated context Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:01:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: nickhuang99 at hotmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:01:38 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102728 Bug ID: 102728 Summary: requires statement fails to recognize lambda in unevaluated context Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: nickhuang99 at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Consider that this snippet of code gives error of no matching specialization which is not rooted from lambda in function parameter, instead it is rooted from "requires" statement violation of lambda in unevaluated-context. The warning about no-return-statement in lambda within requirement exposes this= is "requires" issue. #include template concept IsLambda=3Drequires(T t){ {t}->std::convertible_to;=20 }; template // OK if replace IsLambda with "class" void foo(T t){ t();} template<> void foo(decltype(+[]{}) t){ t(); } Also, a proof that this is not lambda-in-function-parameter issue is that y= ou can replace template parameter "IsLambda" in template function declaration = with "class" and GCC works fine. Both clang and MSVC++ accepts above code. (https://www.godbolt.org/z/xhW7To= fao) : In substitution of 'template requires IsLambda void foo(T) [with T =3D void (*)()]': :12:44: required from here :5:40: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type] 5 | {t}->std::convertible_to; | ^~~~ :12:6: error: template-id 'foo' for 'void foo(void (*)(= ))' does not match any template declaration 12 | void foo(decltype(+[]{}) t){ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :9:6: note: candidate is: 'template requires IsLambda void foo(T)' 9 | void foo(T t){ t();} | ^~~=