public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/102737] [9/10/11/12 Regression] extra mov with int->double conversion and addition (incoming arguments and return)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 21:25:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-102737-4-uUZQdfd00U@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-102737-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102737

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |9.5
      Known to fail|                            |10.1.0, 9.1.0
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
      Known to work|                            |5.1.0, 8.1.0, 8.5.0
            Summary|[x86] Failure to optimize   |[9/10/11/12 Regression]
                   |out bad register usage      |extra mov with int->double
                   |involving int->double       |conversion and addition
                   |conversion                  |(incoming arguments and
                   |                            |return)

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 8.5.0 (and before) would do:
        pxor    %xmm1, %xmm1
        cvtsi2sd        %edi, %xmm1
        addsd   %xmm1, %xmm0
        ret

So this is a regression.

Even with AVX, gcc has an extra move even if inputs don't have to be tied to
the output:
        vmovsd  %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1
        vxorps  %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0
        vcvtsi2sdl      %edi, %xmm0, %xmm0
        vaddsd  %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
        ret

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-13 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-13 21:08 [Bug target/102737] New: [x86] Failure to optimize out bad register usage involving int->double conversion gabravier at gmail dot com
2021-10-13 21:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-10-13 21:27 ` [Bug target/102737] [9/10/11/12 Regression] extra mov with int->double conversion and addition (incoming arguments and return) pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-19  8:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27  9:46 ` [Bug target/102737] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:41 ` [Bug target/102737] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-102737-4-uUZQdfd00U@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).