From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 5EF413857827; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:22:02 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5EF413857827
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102756] [12 Regression] Complete unrolling is
 too senative to PRE; c-c++-common/torture/vector-compare-2.c
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:22:02 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-102756-4-rG0AyR7rP6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102756-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102756-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:22:02 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102756

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Btw, the same happens on x86-64.  With -O2 and vectorization we end up with

  <bb 3> [local count: 858993457]:
  # ivtmp.14_11 =3D PHI <ivtmp.14_12(5), ivtmp.14_13(2)>
  _14 =3D (void *) ivtmp.14_11;
  _1 =3D MEM <int> [(vector(4) int *)_14];
  if (_1 !=3D -3)
    goto <bb 4>; [0.00%]
  else
    goto <bb 5>; [100.00%]

  <bb 4> [count: 0]:
  __builtin_abort ();

  <bb 5> [local count: 858993457]:
  ivtmp.14_12 =3D ivtmp.14_11 + 4;
  if (ivtmp.14_12 !=3D _16)
    goto <bb 3>; [80.00%]
  else
    goto <bb 6>; [20.00%]

  <bb 6> [local count: 214748368]:
  r =3D{v} {CLOBBER};

while everything is optimized away with -O2 -fno-tree-vectorize.

Let's keep this open as a regression since -O2 now enables vectorization.  =
In
principle we could preserve the previous behavior for the very-cheap
vectorizer cost model or adjust the heuristic for that case to only cover
loops with a single BB.

The real issue here is of course the unroller not considering the true
size after simplification.=