From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 994FA385840F; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:47:14 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 994FA385840F
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/102772] [12 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C FAILs
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:47:14 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-102772-4-dmKLmadaMz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-102772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-102772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:47:14 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102772

--- Comment #49 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot =
Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> Anyway, I'm out of ideas and unfortunately Solaris/x86 is not on GCCFarm.

I'd meant to provide a Solaris/x86 system for the cfarm, but it turned
out every user would have to sign an acceptable use policy and run
through a video ident before being granted access, which I consider
unusable for developers and too much effort on the admin side.

I'll see if I can find a different solution, though.

In the meantime, it's possible for indivudual gcc developers to get
regular access to my internal gcc test farm.  I've done that with iant,
for example.  Let me know if you're interested.

> Why is this a P1 when Solaris/x86 is neither primary nor secondary though?

I have no idea: it certainly wasn't me...

> Unless it reproduces also on Solaris/SPARC, which is primary but is on GC=
CFarm.

No, Solaris/SPARC is fine.=